VS
Trading 212 vs Plus500: Which Is Better in 2026?
Trading 212 (real stocks + CFDs) and Plus500 (stock CFDs) compared head-to-head on cost, minimums, markets and safety.
Trading 212 comes out ahead. Trading 212 scores 4.6/5 with $0 commission, a $1 minimum and yes fractional shares, plus $1 minimum and commission-free.
| Feature | Trading 212 | Plus500 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 4.6 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Asset type | Real stocks + CFDs | Stock CFDs |
| Stock commission | $0 | Spread only |
| Minimum deposit | $1 | $100 |
| Fractional shares | Yes | CFD only |
| Markets | US, UK, EU exchanges | 2,000+ share CFDs |
| Regulation | FCA, CySEC, FSC | FCA, CySEC, ASIC, MAS |
| Platforms | Trading 212 app + web | Plus500 platform |
Which one should you actually pick?
Trading 212. UK and EU investors who want to drip-feed money into a portfolio automatically and pay as close to nothing as possible.
Plus500 is not the wrong answer for everyone. Experienced CFD traders who value a simple interface and a listed, well-capitalised operator. Where it struggles: Anyone building a long-term portfolio, or beginners who have not yet understood how leverage and overnight fees interact.
The honest framing is that these two are not interchangeable. Trading 212 gives you Real stocks + CFDs with access to US, UK, EU exchanges, while Plus500 gives you Stock CFDs across 2,000+ share CFDs. If you already know which markets you want to hold, that single line decides it faster than any score.
What each one really costs
On the headline number, Trading 212 charges $0 and Plus500 charges spread only. That is the figure both of them advertise, and it is the least useful one for predicting what you will pay.
Where Trading 212 actually charges you:
- $0 commission on real stocks and ETFs, with no monthly platform fee.
- A small FX fee on trades in a currency other than your account currency.
- Free deposits up to a monthly threshold by card, then a small percentage.
- Interest paid on uninvested cash, which offsets some of the drag on money waiting to be deployed.
Where Plus500 actually charges you:
- No commission; cost is the spread, which is wider than a direct-market broker on the same instrument.
- Overnight funding on positions held past the daily cut-off.
- Inactivity fee after three months without logging in, which surprises occasional users.
- Currency conversion where the instrument is priced in another currency.
For a portfolio under a few thousand, currency conversion and withdrawal fees will almost always cost you more over a year than the commission difference. Work out how you will fund the account and how often you expect to take money out, then compare on that rather than on the per-trade rate.
Is your money safe with either?
Trading 212 is regulated by FCA, CySEC, FSC. Plus500 is regulated by FCA, CySEC, ASIC, MAS. Both are covered by real regulators, so the question is not whether one is legitimate, but which entity your particular account sits under, because that decides your compensation scheme.
Authorised by the FCA in the UK and CySEC in the EU, with client money held separately from company funds. UK accounts carry FSCS protection to £85,000 and EU accounts the local scheme, typically €20,000.
Regulated by the FCA, CySEC, ASIC and MAS depending on entity, with segregated client funds and negative balance protection for retail clients in the UK and EU. Being listed in London means audited, published accounts.
Worth being clear about what that protection is: compensation schemes cover the broker failing and being unable to return your assets. They do not cover your investments losing value. Nothing here removes market risk.
Frequently asked questions
Read the full reviews
Other comparisons